We need a better way to assess the age of lone asylum seeking children
Imagine what it’s like to walk into the complete unknown alone. Terrifying – and even more so for a child.
Often the young people we work with arrive in Scotland or other areas in the UK without any identification or documentation. They may have never held an ID card or passport, and may not know their date of birth or age. They are confused, frightened and some are told by the people who brought them here (agents or traffickers) to state a set age and story, often less harrowing than their real story. Particularly worrying are young girls and women who are told to pretend to be over 18 when in fact they are children.
Age assessment is necessary; getting it right so important
It is important that we quickly assess age to protect children and young people; if they are not identified as children they are routed through the adult process, housed with adults, miss schooling and crucial support - and may even face detention.
Unaccompanied asylum seeking young people face confusion and scrutiny
Young people immediately face a lot of questions about their identity and must prove their age if they do not have identification. And even on the rare occasion that they do have documentation, it may be treated with suspicion, deemed counterfeit and sent away for testing.
Proving identity and age is a difficult and problematic process
If you have ever travelled abroad, lost your luggage and all your identification documents, you know how inconvenient and stressful it can be to replace them.
But the young people we work with cannot simply make a call to their family to seek help or photocopies of documentation; they often do not know where family members are or if they are even alive.
Contacting their local Embassy is not an option either because they have often escaped war, persecution, abuse or exploitation at the hands of authorities and consequently have a huge fear of officials.
Often their birth has not been recorded, for example in Somalia children’s births are not recorded officially; they are to all intents and purposes living ghosts and consequently subject to an age assessment in the UK.
There is no magic formula to determine a child’s age
Age assessment is an art rather than a science - and an extremely difficult judgement. The difference between someone who is 17 and three quarters and 18 and three days is indiscernible. Yet this has major repercussions for asylum seeking young people in terms of how they will be dealt with by the authorities.
It is particularly difficult to assess the age of children and young people who have suffered unimaginable abuse and torture, been exposed to harsh weather conditions, suffered malnutrition, torture or worked from as young as five. There is no accurate medical procedure yet invented which can accurately determine age.
X-rays of bone and teeth still provide a wide margin either side of the estimated age and the data sets used to assess age are still largely based on western statistics and averages.
Assessing a child’s age stirs contentious and difficult issues
There are a huge number of very contentious and difficult issues wrapped up in age assessment. Scottish Refugee Council has long called for a holistic, standardised age assessment that gauges age, but also looks at young people’s needs and vulnerability to ensure they get the best possible help.
There are many different practices taking place across Scotland. There is no Scottish case law on age assessment which sets precedence for guidance on age assessment; social workers in Scotland have simply gained experience through conducting the assessments.
Young people are unaware of the purpose and implications of assessment
During the development of the guardianship pilot project we are conducting with the children’s charity Aberlour, we found that young people didn’t know if or why they were being assessed or the ramifications of the decision.
Very few understood their appeal rights and some hadn’t understood that they had been assessed, found to be over eighteen and would therefore be treated as an adult.
Concerning mental and physical health difficulties, signs of having been trafficked and obvious vulnerability issues only added to the problematic nature of the assessment.
Severe stress and consequences of a wrong assessment
Because there is no Asylum Screening Unit here in Scotland, young people thought to be 18 years old or over are treated as adults and must go to Croydon alone to claim asylum. Worryingly it is nearly impossible to find out if they arrived safely. It is also very frustrating when a young person has been assessed in England and wrongly deemed to be an adult – only later to be found to in fact be a child and subject to a further assessment in Scotland. Conversely it is very important that adults are not placed within children’s units or placed in schools.
Time to change and improve the way children are treated and assessed
Attitudinal, cultural, legal, political and social welfare issues are all embroiled in the issue of age assessment. But it’s time to look at these issues and provide a practical tool and guidance to assist social workers who lead in these assessments.
In collaboration with Glasgow City Council, we have been developing and piloting a new tool and set of guidance in Glasgow that will help to determine the age of children who are seeking asylum alone, and do not have a birth certificate.
The tool provides a template to assist social workers to assess age on a number of factors, and to formally request contributions from other professionals to weigh the evidence and come to a conclusion. It is embedded in comprehensive guidance that prompts the social workers to consider multiple factors, for example country guidance information and trafficking indicators.
A robust, holistic assessment considers a range of issues
Together with the training that we hope to be able to offer shortly, we feel it provides a very useful framework for social workers to use their professional judgement to assess on a number of issues, including vulnerability which contributes to a robust, holistic assessment of a person’s age.
If successful, we hope it will be used by social workers across Scotland.



(5) Comments
It is very hopeful for the UK to read about Scotland's commitment to asylum seeking children! I found a helpful report by UNICEF which tackles many of the things that your article above discusses.
http://www.unicef.org/protection/Age_Assessment_Practices_2010.pdf
I think this is a really important issue. We need to know that children and young people are being treated appropriately for their age and that in Scotland are meeting the requirements of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Surely one key aspect of that Convention must be to find out who is a child so that they can be treated accordingly.
well done Scotland for leading on an issue that affects so many children in the UK.
It's excellent to see this being considered so carefully. It would make a considerable amount of sense when dealing with these extremely vulnerable young people for there to be an interim age category between child and adult - young asylum seeking people aged 16 - 22 perhaps - which would attract a level of care and consideration for safety of the individual which currently vanishes overnight if a young person is initially age assessed as being 18. Any child once in care, including asylum seeker children,are still deemed to need support and help after 18, even though they are legally adult then. Although this too can be open to abuse... (I'm thinking of one young asylum seeker who was age assessed as 17 and then re-assessed by Southampton Social Services as not just older than 17, but quite precisely as 22 - enabling them to make him street homeless overnight)
I discovered on Twitter that the Welsh Refugee Council have released today a report on age assessment in Wales, some of the information and ideas may be helpful to Scotland
http://bit.ly/wrcageassessment